The situation
A team must choose how to introduce a new customer onboarding process. Three options differ in staffing, rollout effort and the questions still unanswered. Existing materials are a long project page and several disconnected slides. Meeting attendees need an accessible overview beforehand, while implementation leads need detailed assumptions available during discussion. The project owner wants the meeting to resolve a decision rather than spend its entire time reconstructing the background.
Build a small, reviewable version
Fix the decision boundary
In Notion, record who decides, what must be chosen now and what remains outside this meeting. Give each option the same comparison fields. Link evidence and name unresolved assumptions, keeping the recommendation visibly separate from the facts used to support it.
Check: All options answer the same decision with comparable fields.
Draft the short pre-read
Use Gamma to develop a concise visual document from the approved decision material. Keep the opening to the decision, recommendation and reasons. Include an explicit uncertainty section and links back to sources, removing background detail that belongs in the supporting appendix instead.
Check: A reviewer can identify the choice and main tradeoff without opening slides.
Build a navigable appendix
Use Plus AI in the team's supported slide editor to prepare detailed option and evidence slides. Give each appendix slide a stable reference used in the pre-read. Verify that chart labels, source dates and assumptions survive the final editing and export process.
Check: Each detailed pre-read reference opens the intended evidence or appendix slide.
Run an independent read-through
Ask a colleague outside the drafting team to read the pre-read and explain the options back. Revise unclear distinctions, then prepare a decision-record template with the chosen option, reasons, conditions and follow-up owner. Keep the final decision blank until the meeting occurs.
Check: The reviewer distinguishes facts, recommendation and unresolved assumptions correctly.
Your acceptance checklist
- The pre-read states who decides and what is in scope.
- Options use the same fields and evidence dates.
- Every detailed claim has a working source or appendix reference.
- The decision record captures conditions and follow-up ownership.
Where the process can go wrong
- Comparing options with different unstated baseline assumptions.
- Hiding a decisive uncertainty in a crowded appendix slide.
- Presenting the recommendation as a decision already made.
Choose the workflow deliberately
Choose a pre-read when participants need context before a consequential discussion. A simple choice may only require the one-page document and source table. Add an appendix where reviewers need detail, and keep the final decision in the maintained project record after people have discussed it.
A working brief to copy
Create a one-page pre-read for [decision owner] choosing among [options] using [approved evidence]. State the decision required now, the recommendation and the main tradeoff. Compare every option using [common fields]. Separate observed facts from assumptions and judgments. Identify what new evidence would change the recommendation. List appendix references for detailed claims and questions the meeting must resolve. Do not invent estimates or mark the recommendation approved. End with a blank decision record containing reasons, conditions, owner and follow-up date.
Tool context and original sources
This is an editorial task plan using the products’ published positioning, rather than a record of controlled product testing. The steps describe a trial for you to run. Confirm current access and terms, and review each tool’s limitations.
- Notion official website ↗ — Organize documents and projects, with AI features available by offering. Profile and source-check notes →
- Gamma official website ↗ — Turn an outline into a visual presentation or document draft. Profile and source-check notes →
- Plus AI official website ↗ — Create and revise presentations within PowerPoint and Google Slides. Profile and source-check notes →
